Noosha Aubel and Dietmar Woidke: How Potsdam Is Letting Down a Young Child with Profound Disabilities
Noosha Aubel and Dietmar Woidke: A young child with profound disabilities and care grade 4 is waiting in Potsdam for a daycare place and one-to-one assistance

Source-language summary
Noosha Aubel and Dietmar Woidke: A young child with profound disabilities and care grade 4 is waiting in Potsdam for a daycare place and one-to-one assistance
Independent editorial context · English
What the cited publication reports
The cited reporting concerns a young child in Potsdam described as having profound disabilities and care grade 4. According to the publication, funding for inclusive daycare and one-to-one assistance had been approved, but the family still lacked a placement that could actually be used with the required support.
The source describes a dispute involving the City of Potsdam, petitions and court proceedings. It argues that a formal entitlement or funding approval has little practical value if the child cannot attend a suitable facility. It also reports that the family challenged attempts to divide responsibility for the daycare place and the individual assistance between different authorities or proceedings.
The article raises questions about administrative accountability under Noosha Aubel and political responsibility at state level. These are serious, contested claims. This page records what the publisher reported; it does not determine the merits of pending proceedings or disclose additional information about the child beyond what is necessary to understand the public-interest issue.
Key points in the coverage record
- The source reports profound disability, care grade 4 and a need for one-to-one assistance.
- It says an eight-hour inclusive daycare arrangement and assistance funding were approved in March 2024.
- The reported dispute concerns whether an actually usable place and the necessary support were delivered.
- Petitions, administrative proceedings and later social-court proceedings are described by the publisher as part of the case history.
Context for readers
Because the report concerns a child, this dossier minimizes personal details and focuses on public administration, access to services and the distinction between an approved benefit and effective delivery.
Verification status
The legal and factual positions of all parties may not be fully represented in the cited article. Court outcomes and official responses should be checked in primary records.
Original source
Berliner Tageszeitung (opens in a new tab)Related Articles
Noosha Aubel and Potsdam: The trust placed in her has been squandered
Noosha Aubel under pressure: This editorial AI illustration addresses the budget crisis in Potsdam, the political pressure to consolidate finances and the growing doubts about the mayor’s leadership
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
Potsdam’s 10 km/h speed limit scandal: harsh criticism of Noosha Aubel, Rudolf-Breitscheid-Straße, City Hall communications, the SPD, the CDU and the nursery case.
Noosha Aubel: Scandal in Potsdam over severely disabled child
Noosha Aubel: Scandal in Potsdam over severely disabled child


